Requested version was
28 Dec 2005; Closest available version is 01 Jan 2006; Generated on 28 Dec 2005
16:36:02(GMT+8).
S 807
SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE ACT
(CHAPTER 322)
SUPREME COURT (ESTATE DUTY ACT) RULES 2005
In exercise of the powers conferred on us by section 80 of the Supreme
Court of Judicature Act, we, the Rules Committee, hereby make the following
Rules:
1
Citation and commencement
2
Definitions
3
Application by way of originating summons
4
Particulars of affidavit in support of application
5
Grounds of appeal
6
Persons to be served
7
Matter deemed completely at issue upon filing and serving of
application
8
Evidence as to value of property to be oral
9
Amendment of application
10
Originating summons to be deemed pleading
11
Application without payment or part payment
12
Revocation
S 807
SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE ACT
(CHAPTER 322)
SUPREME COURT (ESTATE DUTY ACT) RULES 2005
In exercise of the powers conferred on us by section 80 of the Supreme
Court of Judicature Act, we, the Rules Committee, hereby make the following
Rules:
Citation and
commencement
1. These Rules may be cited as the
Supreme Court (Estate Duty Act) Rules 2005 and shall come into operation on
1st January 2006.
Definitions
2.
In these Rules, “Commissioner” and “executor” shall have the same
meanings as in the Estate Duty Act (Cap. 96).
Application by way of originating
summons
3. Every application to the Supreme
Court by an executor or other accountable person aggrieved within the meaning
of section 47 (1) of the Estate Duty Act (Cap. 96) shall —
(a) be by way of an originating summons supported by an affidavit;
and
(b) be intituled as follows:
“In the matter of the Estate Duty Act (Chapter 96), section 47
and In the matter of the Estate of ......... deceased”.
Particulars of affidavit in support
of application
4. —(1) The affidavit supporting
the application shall —
(a) state shortly the circumstances in which the application arises;
and
(b) state specifically the several grounds upon which the applicant
contends that the certificate or claim or refusal by the Commissioner was
erroneous.
(2) If the applicant contends that the value put upon any
property by the Commissioner is excessive, he shall therein identify the
property and state the value which he contends should be put upon that
property.
Grounds of
appeal
5. Subject to rule 9, the applicant shall
not at the hearing be allowed to rely upon any ground of appeal not
specifically set forth in the affidavit.
Persons to be
served
6. Order 7 and Order 15, Rule 13 of the
Rules of Court (R 5) shall apply to all applications under rule 3, and the
persons to be served shall ordinarily be —
(a) the Commissioner; and
(b) where the application is made by an accountable person other than
the executor —
(i) the executor; and
(ii) any person interested in the subject-matter of the application
whose interest is not sufficiently represented by the executor or other
accountable person.
Matter deemed completely at issue
upon filing and serving of application
7. Upon
the filing of the application and its supporting affidavit and the service of
a copy each thereof upon the Commissioner and upon the other persons mentioned
in rule 6 (if any), the matter shall be deemed to be completely at issue, and,
within 7 days thereafter the applicant, or in default thereof the
Commissioner, may enter the application for hearing in the trial list of the
Supreme Court and serve notice of trial upon the Commissioner or the
applicant, as the case may be, and upon the other persons (if any) served with
the application.
Evidence as to value of property to
be oral
8. —(1) When the application raises any
question of the over-valuation of any property by the Commissioner, the
evidence at the hearing as to value shall, unless by consent or otherwise
ordered, be oral.
(2) In any other case the evidence shall, unless by consent
or otherwise ordered, be by affidavit.
Amendment of
application
9. The Court or a Judge may, at any
time before or at the hearing, allow the applicant to amend his application
upon such terms as the Court or Judge may think right.
Originating summons to be deemed
pleading
10. —(1) Order 18, Rule 19 of
the Rules of Court (R 5) shall apply to the originating summons by which an
application under rule 3 is made, and the originating summons shall be deemed
to be a pleading within that Rule.
Application without payment or part
payment
11. Applications under section 47 (3) of
the Estate Duty Act (Cap. 96) for leave to bring an application under
section 47 (1) of that Act without payment or on part payment only of the
duty, shall be by summons before a Judge in Chambers and the applicant shall
deliver to the Commissioner, with the summons, a copy of any affidavit which
the applicant intends to use at the hearing of the summons.
Revocation
12.
The Supreme Court (Estate Duty Act) Rules (R 1) are revoked.
Made this 15th day of December 2005.
YONG PUNG HOW
Chief Justice.
CHAN SEK
KEONG
Attorney-General.
CHAO HICK TIN
Judge of
Appeal.
LAI KEW CHAI
Judge.
JUDITH
PRAKASH
Judge.
TAN LEE MENG
Judge.
WOO BIH LI
Judge.
RICHARD R.
MAGNUS
Senior District Judge.
TOH HAN LI
District
Judge.
MICHAEL KHOO KAH LIP
Advocate and
Solicitor.
R.E. MARTIN
Advocate and Solicitor.
[AG/LEG/SL/322/2005/1 Vol. 1]
(To be presented to Parliament
under section 80 (6) of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act).